July 2007

The best strategy that worked for the Palestinian National concord * Poverty including extreme cases Crosstabulation
% within Poverty including extreme cases
		Poverty including extreme cases			Total
		Extremely poor	Below the poverty line	Above the poverty level	Total
The best strategy that worked for the Palestinian National concord	Fateh Strategy	66.1%	71.8%	69.6%	69.5%
	Hamas Strategy	33.9%	28.2%	30.4%	30.5%
Total		100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
	Value	df	Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square	1.000(a)	2	.606
Likelihood Ratio	.994	2	.609
Linear-by-Linear Association	.242	1	.623
N of Valid Cases	512
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 33.21.