|
|
|
|
|
| Age. | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 70 | 72 | 73 | 75 | 78 | 80 | 85 | 99 | |||
| Reasons behind the belief that Hamas failed to deliver on its campaign promises. | Because of its incompetence | 35.7% | 11.8% | 18.9% | 20.8% | 12.9% | 18.8% | 11.8% | 4.3% | 12.5% | 20.0% | 26.1% | 25.0% | 10.0% | 16.7% | 17.4% | 5.6% | 10.0% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 13.3% | 22.2% | 14.9% | 18.2% | 11.8% | 22.2% | 8.3% | 20.0% | 33.3% | 28.6% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 20.0% | 12.5% | 21.4% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 16.7% | 17.3% | ||||||||||||||||
| Because it did not get the opportunity to deliver | 35.7% | 66.7% | 64.9% | 58.3% | 45.2% | 43.8% | 58.8% | 69.6% | 50.0% | 65.0% | 56.5% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 83.3% | 60.9% | 61.1% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 55.6% | 83.3% | 55.3% | 77.8% | 72.7% | 64.7% | 44.4% | 76.5% | 58.3% | 53.3% | 66.7% | 57.1% | 54.2% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 60.0% | 83.3% | 75.0% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 64.3% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 60.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 33.3% | 70.8% | 60.0% | |||
| Because it did not utilize the opportunities at its disposal | 14.3% | 11.8% | 8.1% | 20.8% | 25.8% | 25.0% | 17.6% | 8.7% | 31.3% | 5.0% | 8.7% | 18.8% | 23.3% | 17.4% | 22.2% | 15.4% | 21.4% | 20.0% | 11.1% | 16.7% | 17.0% | 11.1% | 9.1% | 11.8% | 22.2% | 17.6% | 8.3% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 16.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 25.0% | 20.0% | 25.0% | 12.5% | 13.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Hams government did not fail | 14.3% | 9.8% | 8.1% | 16.1% | 12.5% | 11.8% | 17.4% | 6.3% | 10.0% | 8.7% | 6.3% | 4.3% | 11.1% | 40.0% | 3.8% | 11.1% | 12.8% | 11.1% | 11.8% | 11.1% | 5.9% | 25.0% | 20.0% | 14.3% | 4.2% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 12.5% | 14.3% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 9.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 180.659(a) | 174 | .349 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 193.799 | 174 | .145 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 1.464 | 1 | .226 |
| N of Valid Cases | 782 | ||
| a 195 cells (82.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .09. | |||