|
|
|
|
|
| Poverty level. | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardship cases | Below the poverty line | Above the poverty line | |||
| Evolution of corruption in the PA since the PLC elections. | Increased | 43.7% | 36.8% | 30.6% | 37.5% |
| Decreased | 30.7% | 31.6% | 43.4% | 34.9% | |
| Remained the same | 25.6% | 31.6% | 26.0% | 27.6% | |
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 12.421(a) | 4 | .014 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 12.208 | 4 | .016 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 3.218 | 1 | .073 |
| N of Valid Cases | 627 | ||
| a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 53.25. | |||