Poverty level. | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardship cases | Below the poverty line | Above the poverty line | |||
Has Hamas maintained its pre-election strategy or has its strategy become more reasonable or more extreme? | Its strategy has remained the same | 25.1% | 26.6% | 18.6% | 23.1% |
Its strategy became more reasonable | 48.7% | 45.4% | 59.9% | 51.9% | |
Its strategy became more extreme | 26.2% | 28.0% | 21.5% | 25.0% | |
Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
---|---|---|---|
Pearson Chi-Square | 10.660(a) | 4 | .031 |
Likelihood Ratio | 10.725 | 4 | .030 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | .081 | 1 | .775 |
N of Valid Cases | 644 | ||
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 45.12. |